In an era where a single click can echo across oceans, the line between free speech and the safety of our republic has come under intense scrutiny. This was the sobering reality on Friday, February 6, 2026, as Krystle Horwood, a blogger and former radio host, stood before the Port of Spain High Court to answer to the grave charge of sedition.
The matter stems from a video allegedly posted to social media—a platform that, in our Caribbean context, is often treated as a virtual rum shop for “ole talk,” but which carries the weight of the law when that talk turns to violence. Horwood is accused of using the digital space to invite foreign entities to target the official residence of the Prime Minister, an act the state views not merely as a grievance, but as a threat to the very stability of our nation.
Court Proceedings and Bail
Appearing before Master Mohammed, the charge was laid summarily. Horwood maintained her innocence, entering a not guilty plea. Following legal submissions, she was granted bail in the sum of $100,000 with a surety. However, the court has ensured a tight leash on her movements, reflecting the seriousness of the allegations:
- Surrender of Documents: Her passport must be handed over to the Registrar of the Court.
- Police Supervision: She is required to report to a designated police station once per week.
- Residential Restraint: She must reside at her parents’ home for the duration of the proceedings.
The matter is set to continue on Friday, March 6, 2026, at the Port of Spain District Court.
A Lesson in Civic Duty
While the legal battle unfolds, the incident serves as a poignant reminder of our collective morality. In the Caribbean, we pride ourselves on our vibrant, often fiery, political discourse. Yet, there is a sacred boundary between holding leadership to account and inviting external harm upon our soil.
The Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) underscored this in a post-hearing statement, reminding the public that freedom of expression is not a license for destabilisation. True liberty, they noted, carries a duty to ensure that our words do not become weapons that threaten the peace and security of our neighbours or our institutions.
“Posting content that encourages violence against individuals, or destabilising acts, can have serious legal consequences, including arrest and prosecution.” — TTPS Statement
As we navigate the digital age, we are reminded that our ancestors fought for the right to speak; it is now our duty to ensure that what we say builds our nation up, rather than tearing it down from within.
se·di·tion (noun) /sɪˈdɪʃn/
1. The Legal Definition The crime of creating a revolt, disturbance, or violence against the lawful civil authority (the Government). Unlike treason, which usually involves an overt act like war or spying, sedition often focuses on language—speech, writing, or video—intended to incite people to rebel against the state or its leaders.
2. Key Elements
- Incitement: It isn’t just “hating” a leader; it is the act of encouraging others to use force or illegal means to subvert the government.
- Destabilisation: Acts that aim to disrupt the peace or provoke an “uprising” against the established order of the country.
3. In a Caribbean Context In Trinidad and Tobago, the Sedition Act is a specific piece of legislation. While it is often debated by activists as being a “colonial relic,” it remains the primary law used to prosecute individuals who the State believes are trying to incite “disaffection” or violence against the administration of justice or the Constitution.
Simple Summary: If “Free Speech” is your right to complain about the government, “Sedition” is the point where those words are used to call for the government’s violent or illegal destruction.
The Political Leader We Want for Trinidad & Tobago